by Kestrel » Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:12 pm
I have to disagree..
Point 1.. if you have a Cable or ADSL line running at 9Mb, the maximum throughput you would achieve is around 1000KB/second. Therefore, the speed reported by the network card seem perfectly appropriate.
If they were only receiving those speeds across a LAN network running at 100Mb, ten I would accept that the performance was detrimental.
Point 2.. it is unfair to blame an operating system because a software manufacturer claims compatibility and fails to deliver.
Point 3.. Vista is the best effort MS have made at an OS release since win 95a. True, as with all previous operating systems, it takes too much away from the user and makes thigs complicated in the process. But from a technical perspective, the memory addressing and management is much improved over XP. MS have for once listened to many of the gripes that people had regarding the location of options and programs,
The only real gripe I have with Vista is microsofts innovative profit increasing categorisation system. 4 versions(Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Ultimate), 3 EULA's (OEM, Full, Upgrade), 2 CPU's (32bit & 64bit). making a total of 24 different flavours. no longer can you buy one OS and install it on all your machines (which may be technically breaching the EULA, but is something that anyone with more than one PC does) is no longer as simple as it was.
If MS had released just the ultimate version, in OEM and Retail/Upgrade versions, for 64 OR 32bit at the price of the current retail package, it would have probably hurt the open source scene a great deal.
the benefits quoted to open source are not from the OS itself, because that is good enough to sway novice and intermediate users away from Linux. It is microsofts marekting strategy that benefits the *nix community.