It is currently Tue Oct 20, 2026 7:23 am


IDE RAID Controller Card Review - SIL680-Raid

A place to hang out and have fun
(Not for troubleshooting questions)

Moderator: lilpinkflower

Do you use IDE raid in your system

YES
1
33%
NO
2
67%
 
Total votes : 3

IDE RAID Controller Card Review - SIL680-Raid

Postby teststrips » Thu May 29, 2003 3:10 am

IDE RAID Controller Card Review
Syba/Silicon Image - SIL680 Raid

Most of the new motherboards are offering built in raid solutions. I've also seen a lot of PCI based raid cards. My motherboard (a Tyan Tiger MP) does not have a built in raid solution, so I bought this cheap PCI raid card off of the web ($19 shipped) and found 4 identical Seagate drives on ebay (Model ST320013A - 20 Gig, 7200RPM, ATA 133) to test it out with.

I wanted to answer the following questions:

How much faster is raid 0 (Striping)?
Do I need a raid controller card, or is Software raid sufficient?
Does it make a difference if I have 2 drives on a cable or is it faster with a single drive per cable?
How do the cheap PCI raid cards work?

To start off, I decided to do some baseline tests to see how fast the hard drives were without any form of raid or mirroring. Using my motherboard's on board IDE Ports, I installed the drives, put an empty NTFS partition on them, and ran SiSoft Sandra to see how they rated.

Image

I included a GOOF on my part in the results here. My first run of benchmark speeds was done with the drive’s jumpers unchanged from the factory. Later I discovered they were set to Cable Select. I would have not believed it, but simply jumpering the drives as master or slave increased speed by about 145%!!!!

WinXP Pro has built in software raid (striping) It works by writing 1/2 of the data on the first drive and the other half on the 2nd. (or 3rd’s or 4th’s with more drives) I created a striped volume and again ran Sandra’s file system benchmark.

Image

Now I am seeing some speed increase. 2 drives sees a 131% increase over a single drive, 3 drives sees 150% increase over a single drive. I could not include the 4th drive because I had to keep the operating system drive on the primary master channel.

First off, when I started with the raid controller, I again hooked up the drives one at a time and checked single drive speeds. They were consistent with the host controller’s posted speeds. I then used the raid card’s built in striping features.

Image

As you can see the overall winner is a 4 drive stripe set at a 213% increase over a single drive’s speed. Looking at this from a cost perspective I’d choose the 2 drives on separate cables, as it gives you better performance per drive, and is still a whopping 190% increase over a single drive’s speed. Surprisingly the 3 drive configuration is actually slower than the 2 drive configuration, so I definitely won’t be putting that into effect on a permanent basis.

So, have I answered my questions? Lets see if I can answer them now.

1.) How much faster is raid (Striping)?
Up to 213% faster with 4 drives in the raid set.

2.) Do I need a raid controller card, or is Software raid sufficient?
Software raid does increase the speed, but I’d tell anyone to spend $19 US dollars for better performance

3.) Does it make a difference if I have 2 drives on a cable or is it faster with a single drive per cable?
Having a single drive on a cable very much helps increase the stripe set’s overall speed

4.) How do the cheap PCI raid cards work?
I couldn’t be happier with this Silicon Image SIL-680 based card. It provides faster access to my data, and definitely increases speeds. I do have one gripe though; the stripe sets do not work under Linux. I can use the drives as single drives in Linux, but I am unable to use the raid features of the board with that OS.

I will probably be doing a similar review including Mirrored sets and 0+1 (stripe and mirror) results.

Hey, this isn't something I do every day, but will probably do more often. If you have any thoughts on stuff i could do differently, feel free to let me know!
Last edited by teststrips on Thu May 29, 2003 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
teststrips
Geek Alumni
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 1:00 am
Location: USA - Pennsylvania

Thanks given:0
Thanks received:0
Top

Postby Restek » Thu May 29, 2003 11:58 am

That's a good, thorough review - nice work :)
User avatar
Restek
Geek Alumni
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2001 1:00 am
Location: Uk

Thanks given:0
Thanks received:0
Top

Postby SirCujo » Sun Jun 01, 2003 12:59 am

Very good.. Well done.
User avatar
SirCujo
Geek Alumni
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2001 1:00 am
Location: USA

Thanks given:0
Thanks received:0
Top

Postby PCguy » Sun Jun 01, 2003 10:51 pm

Nice job. Should we post it on the main page?
(\__/) This is Bunny.
(='.'=) Copy and paste bunny into your sig.
(")_(") Help Bunny gain World Domination.

Image
User avatar
PCguy
Lord of the Geeks
Lord of the Geeks
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 1:00 am
Location: A Very Scarey Place
Operating System:

Thanks given:2
Thanks received:4
Top

Postby teststrips » Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:59 am

if you feel it's good enough for the main page, feel free!

I guess with all of us mods we could probably manage to get some reviews going for the main page. We could all put a little bit of time into writing up the new stuff we buy.... just baught a 2 port KVM with cables for 20 bucks... it was 1/2 the price of anything else i found... will probably be doing a review on that soon, esp since my wife works night shift all this week.
User avatar
teststrips
Geek Alumni
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 1:00 am
Location: USA - Pennsylvania

Thanks given:0
Thanks received:0
Top


Return to The Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron