Page 1 of 1
Posted:
Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:55 pmby liljim
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 5:16 amby cantinatub
I've tried both flickr and photobucket. Flickr is mostly used by photographers where they are able to share their photos and have people to comment.
There is another image hosting smugmug but a subscription is needed to avail the unlimited web space for all your images / photos.
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Wed May 28, 2008 9:09 amby venney
photobucket for me
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:05 amby liljim
wow, who dug this old post up? and why am i on top, that was a response to someone else?
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:11 pmby Gecko
I have never tried an image host service, I have my own hosting.
Although I have setup an image host on my server for my kids to use.
liljim,
I think I deleted the user that started this thread and all their spam posts.
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:00 pmby liljim
ah, that makes sense.
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:02 pmby xxxviking
photobucket is better then all as much as i have used...
_____________________________
Re: Which image hosting site is better?
Posted:
Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:11 amby darsh39
flikr has been satisfying me ...!!!